Webcache in eMule Plus
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Webcache in eMule Plus
| spanelsko |
Feb 19 2006, 13:32
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 17-February 06 |
I consider that eMule Plus is one of the bests p2p for ed2k network, but I think that emule Plus would be better with webcache.
What do you think about that? |
|
Post
#1
|
|
| muleteer |
Feb 19 2006, 13:42
|
|
Group: Betatesters Posts: 8261 Joined: 29-February 04 |
Did you search the forums for previous discussions on this topic?
|
|
Post
#2
|
|
| Fuxie - DK |
Feb 19 2006, 16:27
|
|
Group: Managers Posts: 4800 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Copenhagen, Denmark |
@ spanelsko
Also, try looking at this pinned thread.. --> http://emuleplus.info/forum/index.php?show...=22&hl=webcache |
|
Post
#3
|
|
| spanelsko |
Feb 19 2006, 17:20
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 17-February 06 |
oh, excuse me! i didn't saw it
What is the reason? |
|
Post
#4
|
|
| Fuxie - DK |
Feb 19 2006, 17:36
|
|
Group: Managers Posts: 4800 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Copenhagen, Denmark |
QUOTE(spanelsko @ Feb 19 2006, 18:20) There are two reasons (as far as I have understood):
You will get more or less the same explanation if you ask in oMule forum... |
|
Post
#5
|
|
| spanelsko |
Feb 19 2006, 18:08
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 17-February 06 |
QUOTE You only benefit from WebCache if you use the same Proxy that the person you try to download from does, and since ISPs usually restrict proxies to their own users, the chance of you connecting to a person who use the same ISP is minimal, compared to the number of sources for a file. False. In Spain, for example, user of ISPs can use the proxies of their ISP, but everybody can use public proxies (the majority). QUOTE There are moral (and maybe legal) issues to take into account store illegal data (we have to face the fact that ed2k is mostly used for illegal files unsure.gif) on a computer that is not your own. Webcache chunks are encrypted (blocks of 180 KB) |
|
Post
#6
|
|
| Fuxie - DK |
Feb 19 2006, 18:31
|
|
Group: Managers Posts: 4800 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Copenhagen, Denmark |
QUOTE(spanelsko @ Feb 19 2006, 19:08) QUOTE You only benefit from WebCache if you use the same Proxy that the person you try to download from does, and since ISPs usually restrict proxies to their own users, the chance of you connecting to a person who use the same ISP is minimal, compared to the number of sources for a file. False. In Spain, for example, user of ISPs can use the proxies of their ISP, but everybody can use public proxies (the majority). Public proxies tend to be very short lived... QUOTE(spanelsko @ Feb 19 2006, 19:08) QUOTE There are moral (and maybe legal) issues to take into account store illegal data (we have to face the fact that ed2k is mostly used for illegal files unsure.gif) on a computer that is not your own. Webcache chunks are encrypted (blocks of 180 KB) And just because the chunks are encrypted, it doesn't make the content illegal???? |
|
Post
#7
|
|
| spanelsko |
Feb 19 2006, 18:48
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 17-February 06 |
QUOTE Public proxies tend to be very short lived... The proxy that you can put in the options of webcache isn't always the same. This proxy name redirects you to the real proxy, which is changed every day, o when the proxy fall down |
|
Post
#8
|
|
| DonGato |
Feb 20 2006, 10:56
|
|
Group: Admins Posts: 5493 Joined: 21-January 03 From: The Pampas, The land of the Gaucho! |
So it's moral to go taking down public proxies?
Anyway, you know the answer, you know our opinion, the opinion of the original client. No need for further discussions on this. |
|
Post
#9
|
|
| Fuxie - DK |
Feb 20 2006, 16:25
|
|
Group: Managers Posts: 4800 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Copenhagen, Denmark |
Apart from all that, the gain from WebCache is very very smal..
I tested lphant client some months back... I downloaded 3-4 GB in total, but only 700KB came from WebCache... |
|
Post
#10
|
|
| spanelsko |
Feb 20 2006, 23:15
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 17-February 06 |
Gracias por responder DonGato
Fuxie - DK, in Spain webcache users download two hundred MB or more everyday, because some of them have it enabled. Thanks to everybody; anyway, I'll use lphant, with webcache, of course |
|
Post
#11
|
|
| Aw3 |
Feb 21 2006, 02:26
|
|
Group: Admins Posts: 7319 Joined: 8-December 03 |
and adware
|
|
Post
#12
|
|
| spanelsko |
Feb 21 2006, 11:08
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 17-February 06 |
no, cmd client and windows service don't have adware, jajaja
Anyway, I can download binaries without adware This post has been edited by spanelsko: Feb 21 2006, 11:10 |
|
Post
#13
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th May 2013 - 00:01 |