"Get First Chunk" Only, A more advance selection
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
"Get First Chunk" Only, A more advance selection
| Unknown |
Feb 16 2009, 03:56
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 26-April 05 |
Hello guys; hope everyone is doing fine.
A suggetion, something that can be beneficial to us who have relatively small hardrives; please, if possible, could you make another selection that, instead of choosing "Get First/Last Chunk for preview", extend that option box further(another option box after that when cursor is placed over that option) and allow the user to only select "Get First Chunk". I only preview the first chunk to see if it the right video; getting the last chunk makes the file register as the maximum size which takes up valuable harddisk space. This sort of thing would be invaluable. later for now. |
|
Post
#1
|
|
| muleteer |
Feb 16 2009, 04:25
|
|
Group: Betatesters Posts: 8261 Joined: 29-February 04 |
Hi, Unknown.
Very nice request. The only thing I'm a bit concerned about is that some of these new codecs are a real pain about previewing without the last couple of chunks also. In particular, mp4 video files. Btw. we've enabled getting the first chunk for archives too. |
|
Post
#2
|
|
| DoubleT |
Mar 1 2009, 11:14
|
|
Group: Developers Posts: 1076 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Germany |
A better way is to implement NTFS spares file support.
I use this for a long time on Win2k/XP without any problem. Not sure if the problem on Vista persists (start reading...). The patch itself is not very complex. The only thing I didn't take into account is to preallocate space. |
|
Post
#3
|
|
| glaskrug |
Mar 1 2009, 11:38
|
|
Group: Betatesters Posts: 157 Joined: 11-September 05 |
That sounds very interesting!
DoubleT, if you already implemented it, aren't you willing to add NTFS sparse file support to the main branch as an optional per-file feature? |
|
Post
#4
|
|
| DoubleT |
Mar 1 2009, 12:18
|
|
Group: Developers Posts: 1076 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Germany |
QUOTE(glaskrug @ Mar 1 2009, 13:38) an optional per-file feature? No, it's a global option. Quote myself... QUOTE The only way to make a spares file is, when you set special attributes while creating such file. The rest is part of the file system (NTFS). After that you can't change this state of the file. To get a normal file (not sparse), one have to copy this file. |
|
Post
#5
|
|
| glaskrug |
Mar 1 2009, 12:34
|
|
Group: Betatesters Posts: 157 Joined: 11-September 05 |
Ok, I see.
So the choice whether a file is sparse or not has to be made at file creation time, right? Still, I think this would be a very usefule feature, especially for large files (up to DVD size). |
|
Post
#6
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 22:02 |