An attempt was made to access an unnamed file past
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
An attempt was made to access an unnamed file past
| HansWurst |
Aug 20 2003, 12:40
|
|
Unregistered |
... its end-bug
i am using emule plus v1 (imho the best version) and i want to fix this annoying bug in emule plus v1... i have only basic c++ knowledge so please can someone tell me where and how to fix this bug (and please don´t tell me to use the newest version, but rather help me!) ?? thx a lot !! |
|
Post
#1
|
|
| Blackstaff |
Aug 20 2003, 12:44
|
||
|
Group: Members Posts: 574 Joined: 26-May 03 From: Edge of Chaos |
why aren't u using 1G??? instead of the older 1 version? |
||
|
Post
#2
|
|||
| reanimated838uk |
Aug 20 2003, 12:58
|
|
Nutcracker Group: Betatesters Posts: 5198 Joined: 1-March 03 From: UK |
I had this problem in the past, but i havent gotten it past the 1e versions. So try updating to the later versions.
|
|
Post
#3
|
|
| HansWurst |
Aug 20 2003, 13:18
|
|
Unregistered |
but i don´t want to use an older version (i said this in my post above) because v1 runs much better than newer version for me...
so anybody has some code/solution for me pls ?? This post has been edited by HansWurst: Aug 20 2003, 13:18 |
|
Post
#4
|
|
| reanimated838uk |
Aug 20 2003, 13:19
|
|
Nutcracker Group: Betatesters Posts: 5198 Joined: 1-March 03 From: UK |
you dont want to run an older version? because v1 runs better for you....im confused
|
|
Post
#5
|
|
| Blackstaff |
Aug 20 2003, 15:01
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 574 Joined: 26-May 03 From: Edge of Chaos |
there are many releases of eMule+ v1...
the most recent is v1G... (; v1g isn't older then v1... v1 is older.. |
|
Post
#6
|
|
| SyruS |
Aug 20 2003, 15:20
|
|
Group: Retired Devs Posts: 3207 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Frankfurt, Germany |
u got windoze 9x?
i'm not sure if this bug has really been fixed at all... iirc, this message is produces somewhere in safememfile-class method read: afxmessage... or so (i've no code available rigth now) |
|
Post
#7
|
|
| HansWurst |
Aug 20 2003, 15:21
|
||
|
Unregistered |
grml, i meant a newer version v1 was the first version after the v0.2x releases... and yes v1 runs much better that v1g !!! @ syrus: no i have win xp w/o sp1 some code would be usefull... This post has been edited by HansWurst: Aug 20 2003, 15:23 |
||
|
Post
#8
|
|||
| HansWurst |
Aug 20 2003, 18:43
|
||
|
Unregistered |
ok i found the "bug"
thx for help syrus !!! This post has been edited by HansWurst: Aug 20 2003, 18:43 |
||
|
Post
#9
|
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 03:07 |