how to fix friends invalid idents?
|
|
how to fix friends invalid idents?
| xrmb |
May 14 2004, 03:12
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 21-March 04 |
I've some friends with an invalid ident in my buddylist, I know they are the real persons and I just got a wrong/faked ident from someone else and now they have to pay for.
Since I dont how the secure ident works here the question. Is it possible to somehow fix this w/o he or me have to change the hash? Could it be possible to save the ident that was received and discovered as invalid, and add a new action to the friend-menu where I can say "use this clients ident for this hash"? Would that work? (ok, no code in this post, but maybe someone has some for me |
|
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| DonGato |
May 14 2004, 09:03
|
|
Group: Admins Posts: 5493 Joined: 21-January 03 From: The Pampas, The land of the Gaucho! |
Which is the invalid?
|
|
Post
#2
|
|
| DoubleT |
May 14 2004, 09:52
|
|
Group: Developers Posts: 1076 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Germany |
I can confirm this!
I also have a known client with an invalid identification. We both use e+. |
|
Post
#3
|
|
| DonGato |
May 14 2004, 10:11
|
|
Group: Admins Posts: 5493 Joined: 21-January 03 From: The Pampas, The land of the Gaucho! |
The problem and known limitation of this is that AFAIK the secure IDs are being stored in your credits file so if you have that identification used before by another user then your friend will never manage to get a valid ID unless he rebuild his.
Have you tried removing the file (keep it somewhere safe)? |
|
Post
#4
|
|
| DoubleT |
May 14 2004, 10:34
|
|
Group: Developers Posts: 1076 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Germany |
Hm, ok, I will remove this client from client.met using MetMedic and will see what happens.
|
|
Post
#5
|
|
| DoubleT |
May 14 2004, 20:38
|
|
Group: Developers Posts: 1076 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Germany |
Ok, that's it. After removing the client with MetMedic, the identification works correct. Perhaps we should implement a selection in the context menu from the friendlist to remove it with e+.
|
|
Post
#6
|
|
| DonGato |
May 14 2004, 20:58
|
|
Group: Admins Posts: 5493 Joined: 21-January 03 From: The Pampas, The land of the Gaucho! |
You mean remove the entry in credits.met for that client?
That could be abused I think... |
|
Post
#7
|
|
| DoubleT |
May 14 2004, 21:35
|
||||
|
Group: Developers Posts: 1076 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Germany |
Yes.
For what? If one want, one can delete client.met each time before starting emule. |
||||
|
Post
#8
|
|||||
| DoubleT |
May 15 2004, 00:45
|
|
Group: Developers Posts: 1076 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Germany |
Strange, after removing the invalid client from my client.met, we both are valid. My friend didn't change anything!
|
|
Post
#9
|
|
| DonGato |
May 15 2004, 08:40
|
|
Group: Admins Posts: 5493 Joined: 21-January 03 From: The Pampas, The land of the Gaucho! |
Yes... that should be the right behavior as you don't know any more that identification for any user and your friend can enter your queue without any problem, or I'm not understanding you.
|
|
Post
#10
|
|
| DoubleT |
May 15 2004, 12:13
|
|
Group: Developers Posts: 1076 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Germany |
The starting situation was, both sides were invalid. I with him and in reverse. After removing his client on the one side, both are valid. Strange
|
|
Post
#11
|
|
| DonGato |
May 15 2004, 12:20
|
|
Group: Admins Posts: 5493 Joined: 21-January 03 From: The Pampas, The land of the Gaucho! |
You mean you started to be valid on the other side, in other terms your friend didn't see you as invalid anymore without clearing his clients from the other ID?
|
|
Post
#12
|
|
| DoubleT |
May 15 2004, 12:28
|
|
Group: Developers Posts: 1076 Joined: 21-January 03 From: Germany |
Yes!
|
|
Post
#13
|
|
| xalbux |
May 15 2004, 12:34
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 234 Joined: 2-March 03 |
I am/was the opposite client.
Obviously DoubleT's client decided that mine was am invalid one and stored that information for ever. I don't think a manual remove from the client.met is the best solution. I'd prefer recheck that could be initiated from the context menue leaving the other informations in the file untouched. Or if appliable an automatic recheck every n weeks for the invalid clients. Maybe the circumstances for a failed suid are gone. So the permanent storage in the client.met is no smart way. As seen in our experience. |
|
Post
#14
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 03:35 |