Powered by Invision Power Board

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topicStart Poll

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Optimum disk layout for incoming and temp ?

nwpsys
Mar 9 2005, 11:58
+Quote Post





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 15-April 04



Computer configuration:
eMule Plus version:
Using proxy: Don't know
Firewall: Don't know
CPU:
Memory:
Operating System:
Updated drivers
for network and video:
Don't know

Am I right in thinking that if I locate my emule temp and emule incoming directories on seperate physical disks, when a file is completing I will get the optimum performance ?

I am thinking that if the disk head isn't having to move around so much on a single disk, I will get a more resource friendly process.

At the moment I have the two on separete drives located on the SAME physical disk, and my PC really slows as a file completes.

Thanks,

nwpsys
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
Post #1
Reevel
Mar 9 2005, 12:30
+Quote Post





Group: Members
Posts: 21
Joined: 23-March 03



QUOTE(nwpsys @ Mar 9 2005, 11:58)
Am I right in thinking that if I locate my emule temp and emule incoming directories on seperate physical disks, when a file is completing I will get the optimum performance ?


Yes you are.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
Post #2
nwpsys
Mar 9 2005, 12:52
+Quote Post





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 15-April 04



I don't get to be right very often :-) Thanks.

nwpsys
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
Post #3
muleteer
Mar 9 2005, 13:10
+Quote Post





Group: Betatesters
Posts: 8261
Joined: 29-February 04



Basically it's a tradeoff. If you have only one physical disk, then put temp and incoming folders on the same partition for best performance (when a file completes, it will simply be renamed; not moved around at all). The downside is that any fragmentation in the file is also retained. You can minimize this by 'preallocating disk space' for the files as you add them to your downloads.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
Post #4
nwpsys
Mar 10 2005, 07:32
+Quote Post





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 15-April 04



Thanks muleteer.

It sounds like even if I do have more than one physical disk ( I have 4 ! ) it may still be worth keeping the temp and incoming in the same partition to avoid any sort of I/O traffic at all when completing. I run a defrag pass once a week and this always seems to make a good job of reducing fragmentation on the large files - as long as I keep a bit of free space on the disk.

Didn't know about the preallocating space feature, but I have found it now and may give that a try.

Cheers,

nwpsys
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
Post #5
muleteer
Mar 10 2005, 08:20
+Quote Post





Group: Betatesters
Posts: 8261
Joined: 29-February 04



Personally, I have made a small (1GB) partition for the emule folder (exe and config etc.), and another (large) partition for the temp and incoming folders. A lot of the fragmentation comes from the emule.log and debug.log files in the emule folder, so I can defragment that partition very quickly.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
Post #6
nwpsys
Mar 10 2005, 12:30
+Quote Post





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 15-April 04



With my settings, I don't write any log files. I think that was the default, I can't remember switching them off. Am I losing out by not having them ?

BTW, I am going to reorg my discs to have temp and incoming in the same partition, I think.

nwpsys
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
Post #7

Reply to this topicTopic OptionsStart new topic
 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 03:55